Tuesday, September 7, 2010

"My daughter/my sister/my daughter/my sister..."

The Economist wonders about the madonna-whore relationship of state controlled liquor sales/regulation and why it lingers in really, really conservative US states:

Selling off state assets at low prices to politically influential businesses isn't really liberal, in either the left-wing or "classical liberal" senses of the word. I'm not entirely sure how liquor-store privatisation aligns on the conservative map, either. Old-fashioned social conservatives may prefer restricted, state-controlled liquor sales. Economic conservatives would prefer to turn the liquor-store business over to private enterprise. Fiscal conservatives, faced with a choice between keeping the ABC stores or raising taxes to replace the lost revenue, may have a hard time deciding. Maybe that's one reason why the discussion of the issue in Virginia seems to be curiously fact-based: nobody can figure out how to treat it demagogically. Then again, I would've said the same thing about cap-and-trade before this year, too.

Defining deviancy down

Levi Johnston's even less popular than his on again off again, mother in law.

And to think he walked away from the Paul Harvey gig to sleep though a campaign for president

Hibernating Republican Fred Thompson was poked awake by his trophy wife long enough to tweet a swat at the President:

Former GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson on Tuesday compared President Barack Obama’s treatment of the American people to a dog urinating on a fire hydrant.
Thompson’s comment came in response to Obama’s contention Monday that his Republican opponents “talk about me like a dog.”


They need interns from real colleges

Republicans just seem stupid some days. Not only don't they know what state Senator Ron Wyden represents, they don't know how long he's been in Washington DC. It's not 14 years. He was elected to the House in 1980.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Where's Senator Graham? Where's Jim DeMint? Where's Joe Wilson?


Still planning to vote Republican?

Timothy Noah:
All my life I've heard Latin America described as a failed society (or collection of failed societies) because of its grotesque maldistribution of wealth. Peasants in rags beg for food outside the high walls of opulent villas, and so on. But according to the Central Intelligence Agency (whose patriotism I hesitate to question), income distribution in the United States is more unequal than in Guyana, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, and roughly on par with Uruguay, Argentina, and Ecuador. Income inequality is actually declining in Latin America even as it continues to increase in the United States. Economically speaking, the richest nation on earth is starting to resemble a banana republic. The main difference is that the United States is big enough to maintain geographic distance between the villa-dweller and the beggar. As Ralston Thorpe tells his St. Paul's classmate, the investment banker Sherman McCoy, in Tom Wolfe's 1987 novel The Bonfire of the Vanities: "You've got to insulate, insulate, insulate."

How feeding nativism hurts economic development

A University of Chicago prof has an article out explaining why the US needs to look at creative class solutions to fill in the gap during what will be decades of rethinking training US workers.Interestingly, he hints at a reason the political elites in states like SC oppose real change: it's good politics.

What is the alternative to creating new mountains of consumer debt? Instead of looking for ways to resuscitate spending by those who can ill afford it, and creating unsustainable bubbles in the process, we need to think creatively about how Americans can acquire the skills they need to enhance their incomes. The central problem is that too much of the U.S. workforce is unqualified for the good knowledge-related jobs that are being, and will be, created by its economy. Even though the unemployment rate is high across the workforce, it is much higher among those without college degrees.
Upgrading skills and education, however, is not easy. Retraining programs have a checkered history. And not all degrees are equally useful. Moreover, it is incredibly hard for a 40-year-old single mother of two to go back to school. But while realizing there are no quick fixes, we should be using resources during this tepid recovery to help out-of-work Americans, and those still in school, to build better futures for themselves. Active labor market policies—econo-speak for the kind of policies operative in Scandinavian countries that help the unemployed train for new jobs and then support them while they search actively—are well worth examining. So are new scalable technologies that reduce the cost of university education or skill acquisition. We also need to encourage stronger alliances between schools, local authorities, and businesses to create comprehensive learning programs whose end product is employable youth. Fortunately, there are manyexperiments and pilot projects already underway across the country. We need to learn quickly from them and scale up those that are most promising.  
If the United States does little to address inequality, and instead repeatedly tries to stimulate its way out of trouble, government and household finances will get even more fragile. Inequality, as studies suggest, will likely also cause U.S. politics to become even more fractured and polarized than it already is, making it harder for our politicians to make the right kinds of legislative decisions. And a slow-growing, politically-fractured United States that agrees only on penalizing the foreigner, could turn its back on openness and trade, attempting to protect domestic jobs even while hurting growth domestically, and elsewhere. Not just the United States but the entire world would be worse off.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Punk'd

WaPo writer Jonathan Caphart's fallen prey to the First Rule of Blogging: check your sources.
Enhanced by Zemanta

It gives the teabag jokes a new twist



Delaware Teabaggers are running the movement's first anti-onanism US Senate candidate.

Your leaders, following you


Nate Silver & Co. consider what issues the parties are running on. They conclude both sides are trying not to stand for much of anything except bromides:
Democrats have criticized Republicans for their vague agenda – and certainly the Republicans have not articulated anything as succinct as the Contract With America, which aided their exceptional performance in the midterm elections of 1994. But Republicans do appear to have a message that is at least reasonably clear to voters, and reasonably consistent from one Congressional district to the next: pick us, and we’ll repeal health care, secure the border and reduce the size of government. Democrats, meanwhile, who two years ago seemed to have a glut of agenda items, are now having trouble articulating to their constituents exactly what a Democratic vote would gain them. Perhaps that’s why Democrats are having trouble both with the sizable number of voters who are dissatisfied with both parties and in motivating their base.

Comfort the afflicted, afflict the comfortable

One of The Daily Dish's gnomes has a post up about what "opinion journalism" should be about, and Chait comments well on it:

Conor Friedersdorf lists some various conceptions of the role of an opinion journalist:
The purpose of opinion journalism is...
1) ...to make money.
2) ...to attract an audience.
3) ...to influence people.
4) ... to generate ideas.
5) ...to advance conversations.
6) ...to help air different sides of a debate.
7) ...to help the political prospects of your ideological coalition.
8) ...to disparage ideological adversaries.
9) ...to raise the political price of trying you or your former colleagues for war crimes.
10) ...to earn a living as a writer.
11) ...to get on television.
12) ...to produce an intellectually honest argument.
13) ...to accrue social prestige.
LOL on #9.
As I see it, #12 -- "to produce an intellectually honest argument" -- is the correct answer. I'd put it slightly differently: to explain the world as I see it. Understanding the world requires digesting facts, but it can't be done entirely through digesting facts -- it requires some degree of normative judgments as well. That is what opinion journalism should do. You can be in this business to influence people, but then you're in a very tricky position when it comes to writing opinions that might have the effect of influencing people to act contrary to the way you want them to act.
Now, I see calling out dishonest or unpersuasive arguments as a major part of producing intellectually honest arguments. (It's the "argument" part of "honest arguments.") When you do that enough, it can start to resemble #8, disparaging ideological adversaries. But I view disparagement as a side effect rather than the primary prupose. It is fun, though.

Closer to home, Cotton Boll Conspiracy continues its series of reviews of the only SC opinion journalist blogging from the 1500s.

Dealing with it

Iain Dale demonstrates, once more, how UK conservatives are grownups:

Next autumn, Biteback will be publishing book which will tell the history of homosexuality in the Conservative Party, telling how the party has struggled to come to terms with the issue. This is what the blurb says...
An authoritative but accessible account of the Conservative Party’s attitude towards homosexual law reform and gay rights, from the 1950s to the present day.
The book will draw upon extensive primary research and numerous exclusive interviews to chart the party’s progress from an unwillingness to decriminalise homosexuality, via Section 28 in the 1980s, to the current Liberal-Conservative Government, which has produced the first comprehensive statement on equal rights in British history. This will all be presented in the context of contemporary social and political developments. The book will be accompanied by a short documentary, which will tell the same story in a very different and complementary way.

No "Jack Spratt" jokes

Politico, in a story on how the GOP would win the US House, lists SC Congressman John Spratt as a "Majority Maker" seat. Not exactly the Dead Congressman Walking prediction in the SCGOP consultant/bloggerdom, but neither a free ticket to another term.


Not exactly a Must Win seat, nor a landslider- "a class of races that are within GOP reach, but will require defeating well-prepared Democratic incumbents or winning on highly competitive terrain. If the GOP is winning most of these races on election night, a Republican majority will be close at hand. If not, Democrats still have a chance of waking up Nov. 3 with a slim margin in the House."

Sounds like outings are coming

Labor Day marks the traditional kick-off to the fall election season, and one question that will be answered between today and Nov. 2 is simply this: Will there be any more craziness?
'I wonder if South Carolina doesn't deserve to be nominated for an Emmy in the comedy category, for television news coverage,' said Scott Huffmon, an assistant political science professor at Winthrop University. 'We've had some crazy stuff before, but now there's a cumulative effect. We've had a whole lot, and I bet we've still got more in our bag of crazy tricks.'

Not in South Carolina. Debate? Puhleeze.

The Blattster bleats:


Why They Demonize Conservatives

In a post on Palin Derangement Syndrome, iconoclastic blogger R.S. McCain and all around cool and snarky guy gets at the essence of what all too many on the left demonize conservatives:
Stigmatizing and marginalizing conservatives is much easier than debating them. Cogent arguments about policy become unnecessary to advancing the Left’s political agenda if they can dismiss its opponents as racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.
It’s a good post on the leftist tactics which I highly recommend, even while not agreeing with its every word.
He also offers this choice passage on certain critics of conservatives:
What is at the root of this game is the accuser’s moral authority to act as Grand Inquisitor. The accuser arrogates to himself the unquestionable righteousness to judge the accused, who is then expected to attempt to prove his innocence.
Read the whole thing.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wishful thinking?

Everybody in the economics professoriat's all excited that BMW's hiring 1,000 new people could lower the unemployment rate by a percent.

What no one ever asks is how many BMW hires become permanent employees.

Not that many, actually. Get a flicker in the market and they'll drop people like hot bricks.

Their finest hours were yet to come

Cd-2 St. Pauls Blitz

70 years ago today the bombing of London began. It lasted for 76 nights.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Some sensible talk about economic development and a creative environment. Was anyone listening?

I don't generally carry much water for SC ETV Radio, the state's cash-starved, uninspired public radio netwokr so lazy it even does reruns of its classical music feeds. But once in a while they can still do some good work and today on noon's Your Day- a Clemson University program- there was a really thoughtful conversation about the links between creativity and economic growth between Upstate tech guru John Warner and Dr. Bob Becker of Clemson's Thurmond Institute on Government and Public Affairs.

In a wide-ranging conversation the two discussed how SC clings to a mid-twentieth century "Branch plant" strategy of attracting factories to small towns, where locals can graduate high school, maybe get an AA degree, and then live a middle-class life with a house and a stay-at-home wife and several kids. Warren said he was surprised when one of the candidates for state superintendent of public instruction told him it was dismaying, traveling around the state, to hear how many local leaders think that past will return.

Warren extolled various independent development sector efforts in the Upstate but seemed to think the "creative class" side of the ec dev effort- making South Carolina a place young, smart, knowledge workers will want to move to- will somehow take care of itself. The missing piece there, as I've argued before in this space, is the backwardness of the political class- which, in SC, means the Republican Party. When you get a prominent state senator denouncing his own party's nominee for governor as a "goddam raghead", well, that's not gonna be very sellable to, say, Google or Starbucks in terms of getting actual people to come here and set up labs, rather than run servers and grind beans.

The two had a really good discussion about the disconnect between the money SC spends on education and the results achieved. Graduation rates are dismal and curricula have been pared down to shoving facts into students' heads to pass standardized tests, sacrificing the sorts of classes that encourage creative thinking.

Which means, if SC is ever to generate its own knowledge worker class  who want to stay here rather than get the hell out, in the short term we've got to make SC seem like a place people would want to come to- and stay.

So far, it's not working very well.

Here's a link to the discussion.

Monday, September 6, 2010

There'll always be an Alabama

Last month, for the third time and in the face of a 2006 rebuke from the United States Supreme Court, the federal appeals court in Atlanta said there were no racial overtones when a white supervisor called an adult black man “boy.”
“The usages were conversational,” the majority explained, repeating what it had told the trial court after the Supreme Court ruled, and “nonracial in context.” Even if “somehow construed as racial,” the unsigned 2-to-1 decision went on, “the comments were ambiguous stray remarks” that were not proof of employment discrimination.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Another reason they are called "hard right"

Right Side News writer Cliff Kincaid is up on the table, wondering why gay people are so mean to Mrs. Palin:

Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post accuses Sarah Palin of offending homosexuals when she remarked that the author of a Vanity Fair hatchet job about her was “impotent and limp and gutless.” Marcus wrote, “The Vanity Fair writer, Michael Joseph Gross, is gay, which makes matters worse—conjuring the stereotype of ‘limp-wristed.’ But whatever the sexual orientation of the offending reporter, Palin should not have been questioning his manhood.”
Palin had every right to question his manhood, since he is not a man in the traditional sense and wrote a cowardly piece.
The writer goes on to slag a WaPo writer for not disclosing he's gay:
What Capehart didn’t disclose in his column is that he is a homosexual himself. Although he is out of the closet and even participates in homosexual political events, I am not aware that the Post has ever informed its readers about Capehart’s conflict of interest in writing about such matters. He is a member of the Post editorial board but his official bio makes no mention of his homosexual rights activism.  
Two things about that claim: anybody with a head and the sense to come in out of the dark knows Capehart is gay. He's a former correspondent for the PBS-syndicated documentary show "In the Life" and was a member of the panel questioning the Democratic presidential candidates in an Human Rights Campaign-sponsored TV debate in 2007.


Of course, if straight op-ed writers are going to demand that gay ones announce their sexual preferences in public, there's another shoe waiting to drop that could be lots of fun. Just ask Bill "Loofah" O'Reilly.


From there Marcus segues into a long double-standardism argument about sex work ads being cut out of Craigslist (they're just migrating to other, harder to police, parts of the site, as its president predicted), and a gay dating site called Manhunt. 


It's interesting that Marcus can't do basic research to know Jonathan Capehart is gay but can dwell at such loving length on what he calls a gay sex hookup site. Working for hire is what sex workers of both genders do, and that's what the whole Craigslist fracas was about. Manhunt, to borrow a phrase, is more like a whorehouse staffed by volunteers. But it's funny how the 'mo haters spend so much time researching stuff like a gay hookup site.


There are, of course, none in the universe catering to straight people like Cliff Marcus.
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Special Relationship

The former UK prime minister, Tony Blair has a memoir out in which he apparently thinks toilet training is a big part of leadership.
Often the tone and substance of “A Journey” are at odds. Mr. Blair uses words like “freaky” and “karma,” talks about alcohol becoming “a prop” to help deal with the pressures of office, and, in the T.M.I. department, discusses his digestion and fondness for “time and comfort in the loo.”
He is not alone.

Lyndon Johnson, the former US president (1963-69), lugged aides into the can with him all the time.

There's also a famous episode in which UK prime minister Winston Churchill, visiting the White House in WW2, invited President Franklin Roosevelt into the bathroom while Churchill frolicked in the tub.

May, May Not

Gay Arizona Republican Steve May, a former legislator, is recruiting candidates for the Green Party:


Mr. Pearcy, 20, is running for a seat on the Arizona Corporation Commission, which oversees public utilities, railroad safety and securities regulation. Although Mr. Pearcy says he is taking his first run for public office seriously, the political establishment here views him as nothing more than a political dirty trick.
Mr. Pearcy and other drifters and homeless people were recruited onto the Green Party ballot by a Republican political operative who freely admits that their candidacies may siphon some support from the Democrats. Arizona’sDemocratic Party has filed a formal complaint with local, state and federal prosecutors in an effort to have the candidates removed from the ballot, and the Green Party has urged its supporters to steer clear of the rogue candidates.
“These are people who are not serious and who were recruited as part of a cynical manipulation of the process,” said Paul Eckstein, a lawyer representing the Democrats. “They don’t know Green from red.”
But Steve May, the Republican operative who signed up some of the candidates along Mill Avenue, a bohemian commercial strip next to Arizona State University, insists that a real political movement has been stirred up that has nothing to do with subterfuge.
“Did I recruit candidates? Yes,” said Mr. May, who is himself a candidate for the State Legislature, on the Republican ticket. “Are they fake candidates? No way.”

It's Labor Day

We're not laboring. Talk among yourselves.

Inside the teeming id of the SC GOP

The SC GOP blogdom seems to be unusually populated by horny, aging frat boys.

Jim DeMint sets a model for fat constituents

The Tuesday supper was the only formal meal served to the residents, although Jim DeMint could be found most mornings making his way downstairs, in pajama bottoms and T-shirt, to fetch his breakfast of tea, Oreos, and dried cranberries. The men’s private quarters were strikingly modest. Stupak had one of the better rooms, a corner space on the third floor, with a private bath, but DeMint slept in a space just big enough for his bed, and hung his clothes in a closet down the hall.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

It's about votes

``Even gay Republicans agree the Democratic Party is night-and-day better on gay issues. Dems in the House and Senate vote almost unanimously for our stuff; Republicans, almost unanimously against,'' Tobias said. ``I'm sure most Republican congressfolk don't hate gays -- they just don't want hate crimes protection extended to cover us or employment discrimination laws extended to cover us or Social Security benefits to our partners and children -- or to allow us to serve in the military or to marry.''

Private sector, free-market, Republican economics at work

According to the Arizona Daily Star, Brewer says she only partook in the debate to try qualify for the $1.7 million-plus public funds for her campaign.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Headless, no. Brainless? Yep.

Governor Brewer admits not living in the reality-based community.

Not enough public transit in the district to throw him under the bus. New metaphor needed.

Is SC Congressman John Spratt on his own for the rest of the campaign? NYT suggests his party doubts his ability to pull off a win.

Somewhere, Dylan Thomas is wishing he'd kept that line to himself.

It's fascinating watching the brushfires breaking out on the right over gay people.

GOProud's leader and WorldNetDaily's head are going to debate whether you can be conservative and gay.


Farah contends that groups like GOProud are trying to commit a “coup” to unroot the conservative movement with an “agenda…to take the homosexual agenda inside the conservative tent.”
Barron insists that his group is genuinely conservative and said he looks forward taking on Farah in front of a WND crowd.
The latter says no. Hell, no.

Which is nonsense.If you're a conservative you want to be part of a conservative movement, just as if you want to serve in the military you want to be able to serve, or if you want to marry you want the right to do so.Belief in the basic institutions of society is not a function of sexual orientation. It's not rational to argue their importance on the one hand; that certain sorts of people should be excluded from them on the other; and then to disregard and downgrade them in the casual way conservatives eliminated universal military service and embraced serial divorce.Not to mention earrings on men.

What I wonder about is the numbers conservatives throw about. How does Joe Farah know marriage began 6,000 years ago? Why did God not create it sooner? Or does he believe in the creationist, Wilma-and-Fred-riding-their dinosaur-to-church view?
Marriage is literally the building block of our civilization. Destroy it and you destroy thefoundation. The enemy knows this. Do our so-called allies? I am ashamed of these people who should know better flirting with the destruction of a 6,000-year-old, God-created institution with no regard for the unforeseen and unimaginable consequences. That's why I will not be silent. I will not go quietly into the night." 
Enhanced by Zemanta

A death in a family

AP reports Florida US Senate candidate Marco Rubio's father has died after a long illness.

Losing a parent is one of those life events you know must be coming but by which you get knocked back hard. It's a signal of your own mortality and the importance of family as you move forward in your own life, increasingly alone.

Rubio canceled a campaign debate to be with his father and family. Condolences to them all in a sad time.

Write your own headline

Frank Rich wonders, rightly, why the President's speech the other night was so lame:

Our attitude toward the war’s human cost was no less cavalier. We were all too content to let a volunteer army fight our battles out of sight and out of mind, on a fictional pretext yoked to a military strategy premised on a cakewalk. For too long we looked the other way as the coffins arrived in Dover off camera in the shroud of night, as the maimed endured inhumane treatment in military hospitals at home, and as the Iraqi refugees who aided Operation Iraqi Freedom at their own peril were denied the freedom to seek a safe haven in our country.
Both President Obama and Glenn Beck, in his “Restoring Honor” rally in Washington last weekend, were fulsome in their praise of the troops, as well they should have been. But the disconnect between the civilian public, including the war’s die-hard advocates on the right, and those doing the fighting remains as large today as ever. As one Iraq war vet e-mailed to me after hearing Beck’s patriotic sermons: “What does gathering in D.C. do for the troops?” He was appalled at the self-regard of those who thought their jingoistic rally would help returning troops abandoned by the military’s “criminally poor mental health care” or save any soldier who was “two seconds away from getting his leg blown off by an I.E.D.”
The other American casualties of Iraq include the credibility of both political parties, neither of which strenuously questioned the rush to war and both of which are still haunted by that failure, and of the news media, which barely challenged the White House’s propaganda about Saddam’s imminent mushroom clouds. Many pundits, quite a few of them liberals, stoked the war fever as well. Some eventually acknowledged getting it wrong, though in most cases they stopped short of apologizing for their failures of judgment and their abdication of journalistic skepticism about the government’s case for war.

Never, never enjoy it

FITSNews.com is concerned about Christianists ruining sex for everyone else.


So … can holy rollers really get down and dirty with it? Or are they doomed to an eternity of “missionary with the lights off?”
Hmmm … let’s ask the Palmetto state’s resident holier-than-thou horn dog Bridget Keeney about that one, shall we?

Gay panic sweeps SCGOP circles again

It's Gay Pride time in Columbia and the haters are busy hating.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Somewhere, the pot's laughing at the kettle

FITSNews.com is calling a fellow Republican hack "a dubious character."
Enhanced by Zemanta

He was buds with Jesse Helms, too

In a memoir filled with profound navel-gazing, political bombshells and a few purple-prose love scenes, Tony Blair has also found time to salute U2's activist frontman, claiming he "could be ... prime minister".

God will provide

The Pope, who's soaking UK taxpayers for 10m pounds, is drawing yawns over his coming progress.

GOP private sector death panel

“WRESTLER, on behalf of himself or his heirs, successors, assigned and personal representatives, hereby releases, waives, and discharges PROMOTER from all liability to WRESTLER and covenants not to sue PROMOTER for any and all loss or damage on account of injury to any person or property resulting in serious or permanent injury to WRESTLER or WRESTLER’s death, whether caused by the negligence of the PROMOTER, other wrestlers, or otherwise,” it stated.

Somewhere, Jim DeMint's handlers are doing the happy dance

Gotta make the most of one's 15 minutes of fame:





Using fewer words than even Calvin Coolidge could fathom and in his trademark monotone, Greene told The Daily Caller that he is excited about the documentary.
With his longest statement of the interview, Greene explained the concept: “It’s just like that, you know, they follow me, get some behind the scenes.”


Enhanced by Zemanta

Apparently, one can only be so crazy. Explain Sharron Angle, then.

Senator Jim DeMint's Colorado Mini-Me, Ken Buck, has thrown the Teabagger candidate for governor there under the bus.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Change. Decay?

FiveThirtyEight.com has been assimilated into the NYT blog.

Wrong time, wrong place


Luke Stevens, 22, was arrested after an officer saw him punch a 32-year-old man outside the bar at 226 S. Ninth St. about 1:40 a.m, Lincoln Police Officer Katie Flood said.
Witnesses and the victim told police Stevens yelled derogatory terms about his sexual orientation before he hitting him, Flood said.
The man who was hit complained of pain to his face, but he did not need treatment, Flood said.
Stevens had been in the gay bar with a friend Thursday night, Flood said. Police believe he got upset after a woman turned him down.

Just don't cut anything for old people. White ones. Republicans.

Weigel dissects the Bagger Movement and finds its heart in SC:
The politician who’s rightly seen as the ideological vessel of the tea party movement is Sen. Jim DeMint. I’d argue that he’s more important to the movement than its bigger star, Sarah Palin, because DeMint has actually gotten specific about what he wants to do in power and why he thinks tea party activists can help him do it. He thinks that Congress needs to reckon with popular entitlements and spending programs, and it needs to cut them even though this has been, consistently, politically disastrous. His theory is that things are bad enough that Americans understand what needs to be cut. They are ready to give up benefits and programs that, in the past, they’ve supported, because they realize how bad things are. That was the not-so-hidden subtext of Glenn Beck’s big rally on the mall last week. Beck, who’s done so much to inform the Tea Parties, told a crowd of 100,000 or so people in person, and many in the TV audience, that they needed to look inward and look back to God and be ready to restore the pre-New Deal vision of America.

Radio silence, they used to call it.

AZ's guv goes Sharron Angle/Rand Paul underground (emphasis added):


Jan Brewer runs for the border. Money quote:
[She] has put the kibosh on all future debates with her Arizona gubernatorial opponent Terry Goddard (D), after her rather embarrassing display at Wednesday's debate. "I don't believe that things come out in proper context in an adversarial atmosphere," she defended herself.

Not the sort of people McMaster'd be having mint juleps with in his all-white country club, but all the same-

Outgoing SC Attorney General Henry McMaster- whom the voters of SC have rejected as a US Senator and governor- has won a victory in one of his quixotic, tax-funded, vote-seeking, lawsuits.

But it's a nice irony that as McMaster railed against online whores one of his chief deputies got nailed for being in a car in a cemetery, after midnight, with a 19 year-old pole dancer, a bunch of sex toys, and some Viagra.

But he has great hair-

The Secular Right riffs on the old Private Eye joke that if the late Princess of Wales' IQ was a few points lower she'd have been a house plant (just in the fussy, showoffy way SR presents everything)-
Kingmaker: Why Sarah Palin’s Endorsements Really Are That Big A Deal vs. Romney’s Problem in a Nutshell. I estimate that Mitt Romney’s IQ is around two standard deviations above Sarah Palin’s. That’s democracy.

A man of God, called home too soon.

The first military chaplain since Vietnam has died in combat.

Will Fred Phelps picket the man's funeral?

Goetz had written of the differences between his Christianity and the religious views of those the U.S. is now battling. He spent the evening of September 10, 2001, trying to convince a Muslim man (married to a Catholic woman) of the merits of Christianity."It was the first time I had really encountered a Muslim man theologically and we had an open religious dialogue," Goetz wrote in 2008 in the weekly Independent newspaper in Elizabeth, Colo. "I learned much from him about his belief system." While he said he failed to get the husband to convert, Goetz added that their discussion "helped me to understand why those men flew those planes to their deaths" the following day. What he took away from that session is that Muslims believe "there is no greater act of sincere faith or virtuous act than dying a martyr's death for their religion."
He acknowledged that Muslim concerns over what they perceive as a degenerate Western culture can drive some Muslims toward terror. "As Americans we repudiate the practice of the terrorist," he said. "Though I disagree with their practice, I do understand their complaints against western society." Goetz wondered if Americans are devoted to something so much that they would willingly die for it. "Our love for freedom is worth dying for," he concluded, "and many have gone before us to preserve this freedom."


Amtrak, PBS and the Legal Services Corporation, for starters. Oh, and the Department of Education.

Jonathan Chait explains the new Republican strategy of running stealth candidates in plain sight:

Linda McMahon says the budget should be balanced every year, recession included. But what would she cut?
“I can certainly tell you I’m not adverse to talking in the right time or forum about what we need to do relative to our entitlements,” McMahon said in an interview. “I mean, Social Security is going to go bankrupt. Clearly, we have to strengthen thatI just don’t believe that the campaign trail is the right place to talk about that.
There's a way to avoid giving specifics during a campaign. Outright saying you don't want to talk specifics during the campaign is not it.
Meanwhile, one of The Young Guns says he's got a plan but not what is in it. 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Conflict among conservatives

The Cotton Boll Conspiracy has taken exception to another SC blog, Sunlit Uplands.

Watch out now for CBC's writer(s) to be subjected to private investigations and outings, where applicable.

One simply does not disagree with The Man.

Here's an example of the lunacy over there.

Marxist lesbians?

Prove it.

What happened to Alf Landon Republicans?

"I'm not a Barry Goldwater Republican; I'm a Ronald Reagan Republican," he said. 
It's an odd comparison Senator Lindsey Graham made this week, working his way through meetings with Teabaggers and the talk radio outlets, zigging off his previous zags that so annoyed the 'baggers and several county GOP clubs.

The interview in which Senator Graham made the point is here. 

Ronald Reagan launched his political career with a legendary speech supporting Barry Goldwater for president in 1964. Goldwater was a military reservist: Reagan played a soldier and airman in films.Graham seems to mark Reagan  as a trimmer, willing to compromise and deal with Democrats. In one of the stranger episodes in the interview Graham cited Reagan's amnesty legislation for illegal immigrants as an example of his willingness to compromise, and in the next breath said Reagan was wrong to do so.

Graham's attempt to distinguish between Republicanism and libertarianism deems to defy rational understanding. Senator Graham's interview is worth listening to as an example of how conservatives parse their bona fides almost into invisibility.