When do you get to a level of proficiency that exceeds "practicing"? I mean, jeez, he's 66

Bryan Fischer, director of issue analysis for the American Family Association, calls Walker's decision a tyrannical, abusive, and utterly unconstitutional display of judicial arrogance -- and argues that members of Congress should immediately launch impeachment proceedings against Walker.
 
"[It's an] absolutely outrageous and unconscionable ruling by this federal judge to so cavalierly overturn the expressed will of seven-million voters in the state of California," Fischer offers. "[He] didn't even have the legal right to consider this case. Marriage policy is not established in the federal constitution. Under the Tenth Amendment that issue is reserved for the states. So this judge trampled the Constitution [and] trampled the will of the voters in California."
 
In a press release yesterday, AFA identifies Walker as a "practicing homosexual" who, for that reason, should have recused himself from this case "because his judgment is clearly compromised by his own sexual proclivity." Fischer concurs.
 
"It's really no different in our judgment than having a judge who owns a porn studio being asked to issue a ruling on an anti-pornography statute," says the AFA spokesman. "There's a conflict of interest there."

Related articles by Zemanta

• Voting Out the Constitution (omnipotentpoobah.com)
• Gay Marriage Foes Want to Impeach Judge Who Overturned Prop 8 (laist.com)
• The Best Worst Prop 8 Reactions [Conservatives] (gawker.com)