Politico reports on the oddest of the odd this election cycle (why not just run them through Moment of Truth?):
Sodrel agrees to wear lie detector at debate
File this under bizarre campaign developments.
The Republican party chairman in Rep. Baron Hill's Congressional district wants all the candidates to be hooked up to lie detectors at the next debate. Hill is facing a familiar rival, former GOP Rep. Mike Sodrel, whom he defeated in 2006 Sodrel embraced the proposal.
From the AP:
Two challengers for an Indiana congressional seat have agreed to be hooked up to lie detectors during a debate, but an official with the incumbent's party dismisses the idea as "bizarre."
Ninth District Republican Party Chairman Larry Shickles on Wednesday proposed the political polygraphs for Democratic Rep. Baron Hill, GOP challenger Mike Sodrel and Libertarian candidate Eric Schansberg. The three are scheduled to debate Oct. 21, but an official with a debate co-sponsor said lie detectors won't be included.
"Our planning committee worked up the format and rules, and we are not inviting negotiations from the candidates," Alan Johnson, dean of Vincennes University's Jasper Campus, told The Herald of Jasper.
Shickles, in a letter sent Tuesday to 9th District Democratic Chairman Mike Jones, suggested that the candidates be hooked up to lie detecting machines at the Oct. 21 event or a separate debate.
"While this format may be unusual, I feel strongly that voters need to be able to make a clear decision without all the usual spin," Shickles wrote.
Sodrel's campaign said he would agree to the proposal, and Schansberg said he also would agree to wear a lie detector. Hill declined to comment.
Jones said having a lie detector debate "just seems pretty bizarre."
No comments:
Post a Comment