Thursday, February 10, 2011

One can only imagine what lunch conversations are like in Columbia

Cotton Boll Conspiracy takes a post of mine to argue that a consultant/blogger who works for the SC senate GOP caucus is wrong in his argument for tort reform but if the legislature enacts tort reform he will be proved right.
at

1 comment:

  1. Cotton Boll ConspiracyFebruary 10, 2011 at 7:39 AM

    My point is that Donehue's argument is based on a fallacy. Any state in the country can identify an area or two where juries can be more easily manipulated; that doesn't in and of itself mean there's a need for comprehensive "tort reform."

    Simply put, a handful of high-priced payouts does not prove that tort reform is overdue. Donehue's merely playing up a hot button issue to generate support for tort reform legislation.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)