Are SC righty bloggers going the Glenn Beck "amp it up, never mind the facts" route to bigger numbers?

"Fairness Doctrine!"

Anaconda's apparently so bored- or lazy- he's actually put up a story- complete with a gamin gagged by an American flag- claiming The Obama administration is bringing back the Fairness Doctrine, adopted at the dawn of television and dropped in 1987, which required broadcasters to make time for opposing editorial points of view. "The Fairness Doctrine is back," he headlines.

It's been a favorite bloody shirt for conservatives since the '08 campaign. Just mention the phrase and they all start drooling like the platform party at Dr Pavlov's last dog alumni weekend dinner.

Anaconda's smoking gun? Some guy appointed Chief Diversity Officer for the Federal Communications Commission wrote a book in which he speaks favorably of the restoration of the doctrine.

Like this dweeb's secretly pulling the strings of the FFC commissioners. Folks throws in the old constants that Nancy Pelosi and other congressional leaders want to restore it, too, and you've got a typical Glenn Back rant about how the government that isn't trying to pass this is a dictatorship that can do whatever it wants at will.

It seems Anaconda's fallen into the same facts-free zone Boy Fogle's been adrift in since his post claiming a private foundation that isn't taxpayer funded used taxpayer money to publish a tourism book that was paid for by BMW and Fujifilm and written by SC's tourism director, Chad Prosser, and that Prosser must've gotten a cut of the proceeds: all of which was easily shown to be false in about ten minutes of giong back to original sources in the press.

In Anaconda's case, the article he quotes- and links to at Christian News Service, actually says this:

FCC’s Chief Diversity Officer Wants Private Broadcasters to Pay a Sum Equal to Their Total Operating Costs to Fund Public Broadcasting
Thursday, August 13, 2009
By Matt Cover

Seal of the Federal Communications Commission

(CNSNews.com) - Mark Lloyd, newly appointed Chief Diversity Officer of the Federal Communications Commission, has called for making private broadcasting companies pay licensing fees equal to their total operating costs to allow public broadcasting outlets to spend the same on their operations as the private companies do.

Lloyd presented the idea in his 2006 book, Prologue to a Farce: Communications and Democracy in America, published by the University of Illinois Press.

Lloyd’s hope is to dramatically upgrade and revamp the Corporation for Public Broadcasting through new funding drawn from private broadcasters.

The CPB is a non-profit entity that was created by Congress and that currently receives hundreds of millions of dollars in federal subsidies each year. In fiscal 2009, it is receiving an appropriation of $400 million.

“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) must be reformed along democratic lines and funded on a substantial level,” Lloyd wrote in his book.

“Federal and regional broadcast operations and local stations should be funded at levels commensurate with or above those spending levels at which commercial operations are funded,” Lloyd wrote. “This funding should come from license fees charged to commercial broadcasters. Funding should not come from congressional appropriations. Sponsorship should be prohibited at all public broadcasters.”

Along with this money, Lloyd would regulate much of the programming on these stations to make sure they focused on “diverse views” and government activities.

“Local public broadcasters and regional and national communications operations should be required to encourage and broadcast diverse views and programs,” wrote Lloyd. “These programs should include coverage of all local, state and federal government meetings, as well as daily news and public issues programming.

“In addition, educational programs for children and adults, and diverse, independent personal and cultural expression should be encouraged,” he wrote.

Dennis Wharton, Executive Vice President of Media Relations at the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) told CNSNews.com that his organization, which represents radio and television broadcasters, supports public broadcasting, but that that support should come from the public in general not broadcasters alone.

“NAB supports federal funding for public broadcasting,” said Wharton. “However, we would oppose efforts to fund public broadcasting through fees assessed against free and local broadcasters who are experiencing the worst advertising recession in 50 years.”

Lloyd wrote Prologue to a Farce while a senior fellow at the liberal Center for American Progress. In that capacity, he co-authored the 2007 report The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio, which concluded that 91% of talk radio programming is conservative and 9% is “progressive.”

The report argued that large corporate broadcasting networks had driven liberals off the radio, and that diversity of ownership would increase diversity of broadcasting voices.

So what the guy is arguing is a BBC-style model for public television. Ideas is what people in think tanks come up with. You can take that one or leave it, but it's a far cry from imposing the Fairness Doctrine on the entire broadcast spectrum.

Blogging must be so much easier when you only have to read the top graph and then just make up the rest.